AI underwriting for every loan type you book
One system for CRE, SBA, C&I, construction, bridge, ABL, equipment, and ag loans. Every figure traces to its source document.
| # | Particulars | #FY2023Audited | #FY2024Audited | #FY2025Audited · Annual |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income | ||||
| 1 | Revenue from Operations | 387.1 | ▲8.9%421.5 | ▲11.1%468.2 |
| 2 | TMT Bars & Rods | 213.0 | 232.0 | 258.0 |
| 3 | Structural Steel (angles/channels/beams) | 92.0 | 100.0 | 112.0 |
| 4 | Billets & Semi-finished | 58.0 | 63.0 | 70.0 |
| 5 | Wire Rods & Others | 24.1 | 26.5 | 28.2 |
| 6 | Other Income | 4.6 | ▲13.0%5.2 | ▲11.5%5.8 |
| 7 | Total Incomeƒ | 391.7 | ▲8.9%426.7 | ▲11.1%474.0 |
| Expenses | ||||
| 8 | Cost of Materials Consumed | 250.0 | ▲8.0%270.0 | ▲11.1%300.0 |
| 9 | Changes in Inventories | −2.0 | ▼25.0%−2.5 | ▼20.0%−3.0 |
| 10 | Employee Benefits Expense | 24.0 | ▲10.4%26.5 | ▲9.4%29.0 |
| 11 | Power & Fuel | 34.0 | ▲10.3%37.5 | ▲14.7%43.0 |
| 12 | Other Expenses | 33.4 | ▲9.3%36.5 | ▲8.5%39.6 |
| 13 | Total Operating Expensesƒ | 339.4 | ▲8.4%368.0 | ▲11.0%408.6 |
| 14 | EBITDAƒ | 52.3 | ▲12.2%58.7 | ▲11.4%65.4 |
| 15 | Depreciation & Amortisation | 12.0 | ▲8.3%13.0 | ▲7.7%14.0 |
| 16 | EBITƒ | 40.3 | ▲13.4%45.7 | ▲12.5%51.4 |
| 17 | Finance Costs | 16.3 | ▲2.5%16.7 | ▲1.8%17.0 |
| 18 | Profit Before Taxƒ | 24.0 | ▲20.8%29.0 | ▲18.6%34.4 |
| 19 | Tax Expense | 6.0 | ▲20.0%7.2 | ▲19.4%8.6 |
| 20 | Profit After Taxƒ | 18.0 | ▲21.1%21.8 | ▲18.3%25.8 |
Meridian Steel Corp.
$45.0M Senior Secured Term Loan · Phase II Capacity Expansion · 6 years · 12-mo interest-only · 3 tranches
1. Recommendation & Credit View
This memorandum recommends approval of a $45.0M Senior Secured Term Loan for Meridian Steel Corp. to fund a Phase II capacity expansion, upgrading the rolling mill from 120,000 to 165,000 tons per year. The facility is a 6-year term loan with a 12-month interest-only period, drawn in three milestone-linked tranches. Project cost is $62.0M against a sponsor equity contribution of $17.0M (27.4%).[1]
Meridian is a mid-market integrated steel manufacturer in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, with 9 consecutive profitable years. FY25 revenue was $468.2M (+11.1% YoY), EBITDA $65.4M at a 14.0% margin, and PAT $25.8M. Debt/Equity improved from 1.46x to 1.14x, DSCR is 1.62x, and interest coverage is 3.85x, all comfortably inside policy.[2]
The internal grade is BBB- (score 72/100); the senior secured position lifts the facility one notch to BBB. Base-case DSCR troughs at 1.47x in FY27E during the capex ramp and rebuilds to 2.75x by FY32E; net leverage clears 1.0x by FY31E. RAROC of 18.9% clears the 15% hurdle. Recommendation: approve, subject to the covenant package and conditions below.[3]
2. Facility Structure & Sources / Uses
The $45.0M senior secured term loan disburses in three milestone-linked tranches, each released on independent-engineer sign-off:
| Tranche | Amount $ M | Drawdown | Use of proceeds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tranche 1 | 18.0 | On close | Rolling-mill civil & structural works |
| Tranche 2 | 17.0 | Milestone 1 · month 6 | Mill equipment & automation |
| Tranche 3 | 10.0 | Milestone 2 · month 12 | Balancing plant & commissioning |
| Total facility | 45.0 | 20 quarterly instalments after the 12-mo interest-only period | |
Sources of funds
| Source | $ M | % |
|---|---|---|
| Senior Secured Term Loan | 45.0 | 72.6% |
| Sponsor equity | 17.0 | 27.4% |
| Project cost | 62.0 | 100% |
Uses of funds
| Use | $ M |
|---|---|
| Rolling mill & primary equipment | 48.0 |
| Balance-of-plant & utilities | 8.0 |
| Margin for working capital | 4.0 |
| Contingency | 2.0 |
| Total project cost | 62.0 |
Uses are capex-weighted: 90% funds the rolling mill and balance-of-plant, with $4M of working-capital margin and $2M contingency. No proceeds refinance existing debt, so the facility is genuinely growth capital.
3. Borrower & Group
4. Industry & Positioning
| Producer | Revenue | EBITDA margin | Net Debt/EBITDA | D/E | RoCE | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meridian Steel | 468 | 14.0% | 3.51x | 1.14x | 10.5% | BBB- |
| Allegheny Bar & Rod | 620 | 13.2% | 3.9x | 1.35x | 9.2% | BB+ |
| Keystone Ispat | 410 | 15.1% | 2.8x | 0.95x | 12.1% | BBB |
| Monongahela Structurals | 540 | 12.4% | 4.4x | 1.60x | 8.0% | BB |
| Laurel TMT & Power | 355 | 14.6% | 3.2x | 1.05x | 11.4% | BBB- |
5. Revenue & Volume Analysis
Volume-led growth
Revenue is driven by a capacity ramp (120k → 165k TPA, utilization 75% → 92%) and an improved product mix (TMT/rebar 55%, structural 30%, wire rod 15%), not price, realization is held flat in the base case.
Backward-integrated EAF model
An Electric Arc Furnace route with in-house scrap processing provides a ~$15-18/ton cost advantage over standalone re-rollers.
Infrastructure exposure
~40% of revenue is under long-term contracts with EPC contractors; the $1.2T federal Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act underpins multi-year demand.
Cash flow generation
Positive operating cash flow for 5 straight years; FY25 CFO $58.0M covers interest 3.4x.
6. Financial Performance
- Revenue grew 11.1% YoY; ~14% volume growth offset by a ~3% realization decline.
- D/E improved to 1.14x vs the 2.0x covenant; DSCR of 1.62x gives 30% headroom above the 1.25x floor.
- Validate whether the FY25 margin uptick is structural or driven by one-time cost deferrals.
- Confirm FY26 guidance; management indicated $520M but no formal projection has been shared.
7. Ratio Analysis
Profitability
| Ratio | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|
| EBITDA Margin | 13.5% | 13.9% | 14.0% |
| PAT Margin | 4.7% | 5.2% | 5.5% |
| Return on Equity | 9.7% | 10.6% | 11.3% |
| Return on Capital Employed | 8.8% | 9.6% | 10.5% |
Leverage & Solvency
| Ratio | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.46x | 1.31x | 1.14x |
| Total Debt / EBITDA | 5.22x | 4.57x | 4.00x |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.76x | 4.10x | 3.51x |
| TOL / TNW | 1.81x | 1.66x | 1.50x |
Coverage & Debt Service
| Ratio | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interest Coverage | 3.21x | 3.52x | 3.85x |
| EBIT / Interest | 2.47x | 2.74x | 3.02x |
| DSCR | 1.38x | 1.51x | 1.62x |
| CFO / Total Debt | 18% | 19% | 22% |
Liquidity & Working Capital
| Ratio | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.12x | 1.91x | 1.76x |
| Quick Ratio | 1.42x | 1.25x | 1.14x |
| Debtor Days (DSO) | 92 | 91 | 88 |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 152 | 145 | 137 |
8. Working Capital & Borrowing Base
Borrowing-base assessment · $ M
| Inventory (paid stock) | 95.8 |
| Less: sundry creditors | (56.0) |
| Paid stock | 39.8 |
| Less: margin @ 25% | (9.9) |
| Eligible paid stock | 29.9 |
| Book debts < 90 days | 92.0 |
| Less: margin @ 40% | (36.8) |
| Eligible book debts | 55.2 |
| Borrowing base | 85.1 |
| Revolver limit | 75.0 |
| Current utilisation (80%) | 60.0 |
9. Debt Profile & Repayment
| Facility | Type | Committed | Outstanding | Rate | Maturity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Syndicated Term Loan | Term | 230.0 | 178.0 | SOFR+2.75% | Mar 2031 |
| Equipment Finance | Term | 18.0 | 12.0 | SOFR+3.25% | Mar 2028 |
| Revolver / ABL | Working capital | 75.0 | 60.0 | SOFR+3.00% | Annual renewal |
| Trade Finance (LC-backed) | Trade finance | 20.0 | 11.8 | SOFR+2.40% | ≤ 180 days |
| Existing debt | 343.0 | 261.8 | ~9.3% all-in | ||
| Proposed, Phase II Term Loan | Term | 45.0 | - | SOFR+2.75% | Mar 2032 |
Repayment & debt-service schedule · $ M
| FY | Principal | Interest | Total service |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY26E | 16 | 15 | 31 |
| FY27E | 25 | 17 | 42 |
| FY28E | 24 | 16 | 40 |
| FY29E | 22 | 14 | 36 |
| FY30E | 20 | 12 | 32 |
| FY31E | 16 | 10 | 26 |
| FY32E | 10 | 8 | 18 |
Debt service peaks at $25M principal in FY27E, covered 1.47x; the new facility begins amortising after the moratorium.
10. Projections & Assumptions
| Particulars ($ M / ratio) | FY25A | FY26E | FY27E | FY28E | FY29E | FY30E | FY31E | FY32E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 468.2 | 520 | 614 | 702 | 770 | 790 | 790 | 790 |
| EBITDA | 65.4 | 73.3 | 87.2 | 101.1 | 112.4 | 116.9 | 116.9 | 118.5 |
| EBITDA margin | 14.0% | 14.1% | 14.2% | 14.4% | 14.6% | 14.8% | 14.8% | 15.0% |
| Profit After Tax | 25.8 | 29.5 | 36.1 | 45.8 | 55.0 | 59.9 | 61.4 | 64.9 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.51x | 3.34x | 2.87x | 2.25x | 1.71x | 1.28x | 0.90x | 0.46x |
| DSCR | 1.62x | 1.55x | 1.47x | 1.63x | 1.88x | 2.14x | 2.42x | 2.75x |
DSCR troughs at 1.47x in FY27E during the capex ramp, rebuilding to 2.75x by FY32E; net leverage clears 1.0x by FY31E. Realisation is held flat, so the deleveraging is volume-led.
11. Sensitivity & Scenario Analysis
| Scenario | Revenue | EBITDA | Min DSCR | Peak Leverage | Covenant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base | as modelled | as modelled | 1.47x | 3.34x | Comply |
| Downside · margin −150 bps, ramp +1 yr | −8% | −15% | 1.28x | 4.02x | Thin (holds) |
| Severe · price −8%, volume −12%, +200 bps | −20% | −25% | 1.08x | 5.10x | Breach → cure |
Break-even to the 1.25x floor
DSCR sensitivity
FY27E · realisation $/t × utilisation %| $/t ↓ · util % → | 72% | 80% | 88% | 95% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $645 | 1.28x | 1.42x | 1.56x | 1.68x |
| $675 | 1.37x | 1.52x | 1.67x | 1.80x |
| $700 | 1.47x | 1.63x | 1.79x | 1.93x |
| $730 | 1.57x | 1.74x | 1.91x | 2.06x |
| $755 | 1.67x | 1.85x | 2.03x | 2.19x |
12. Internal Rating & Scorecard
Internal BBB- obligor / BBB facility · PD 1.80% · LGD 35% · expected loss 0.63% · obligor score 72 / 100.
| Factor | Band | Score / 100 | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coverage | Interest coverage 3.85x | 82 | 28% |
| Leverage | D/E 1.14x, improving | 78 | 24% |
| Profitability | EBITDA margin 14.0% | 75 | 20% |
| Business Risk | Top-3 customers 41% | 74 | 16% |
| Liquidity | Current ratio 1.76x | 70 | 12% |
13. Risk Assessment & Mitigants
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigant | Residual |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steel-price cyclicality | Med-High | High | Flat-price base case; input pass-through; DSCR covenant | Medium |
| Leverage elevated through capex | Medium | Medium | Amortizing structure; step-down covenant; 27% sponsor equity | Low-Med |
| Customer concentration (top-3 41%) | Medium | Medium | Diversifying across 6 end-markets; LC-backed export; reporting covenant | Medium |
| Phase II execution & ramp-up | Medium | Medium | 9-yr sponsor track; milestone-linked tranches; independent feasibility study | Low-Med |
| Working-capital stretch | Low-Med | Medium | Borrowing-base-linked revolver; aging improving (DSO 92→88) | Low |
| Environmental / regulatory | Medium | Medium | Permits current; controls embedded in capex | Low |
| Sponsor / governance | Low | High | 74% holding, no pledge, clean bureau, stable board | Low |
14. Data Triangulation
| Figure | Sources | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue $468.2M | Audited · Tax Return · Sales Tax | ✓ Consistent (3 sources) |
| EBITDA $65.4M | Audited · Bank | ✓ Consistent |
| Total Debt $261.8M | Audited · Bank | ✓ Consistent |
| Inventory $95.8M | Audited · Borrowing Base | ✓ Consistent (within 2%) |
| Cash & Bank | Audited $32.4M · Bank $30.1M | ⚠ 7% variance, Review |
5 figures · 4 sources · 4 consistent · 1 to review; the cash-balance variance is a condition precedent.
15. Security & Covenants
Security package
- First lien (pari-passu) on Phase II and existing plant & equipment (net block $245M).
- Mortgage on factory land & building, Pittsburgh; appraiser-assessed realizable value $308M.
- Secured term debt (existing + new) $235M → security cover 1.31x.
- Sponsor personal guarantee (independently assessed net worth $95M).
Covenant package
| Covenant | Threshold | Current | Trough | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DSCR | ≥ 1.25x | 1.62x | 1.47x (FY27E) | Comply |
| Total Debt / EBITDA | ≤ 4.25x → 3.0x | 4.00x | 3.89x (FY26E) | Comply |
| Interest Coverage | ≥ 2.50x | 3.85x | 3.86x (FY26E) | Comply |
| TOL / TNW | ≤ 2.00x | 1.50x | ~1.45x | Comply |
| Promoter Holding | ≥ 51% | 74% | 74% | Comply |
| Security Cover | ≥ 1.25x | 1.31x | 1.31x | Comply |
16. Legal, Compliance & Diligence
- Litigation: No active bankruptcy or litigation (company or sponsor); 1 resolved matter FY23
- Regulatory / Bureau: Not on default / suit-filed lists; no adverse media (12-month scan)
- Management: New CFO appointed Jan 2026 (informational); board and sponsors stable
- Environmental: operating consents current; Phase-II capex includes emission-control equipment.
- Banking conduct satisfactory across all facilities.
17. Pricing, Returns & Conditions
Pricing & returns
| Coupon | SOFR-linked ~9.25% all-in |
| Cost of funds | ~6.90% |
| Net interest margin | ~2.35% |
| Origination fee | 0.75% ($0.34M) |
| Expected-loss charge | 0.63% ($0.28M) |
| Economic capital | ~$5.4M |
| RAROC | 18.9% (hurdle 15%) |
Conditions precedent
- Reconcile the $2.3M cash-balance variance before first drawdown.
- Receive outstanding property & casualty insurance; note lender as loss-payee.
- Perfect first lien on Phase II assets; file UCC within 30 days of drawdown.
- Independent lender's-engineer sign-off before each tranche release.
Conditions subsequent
- Maintain DSCR ≥ 1.25x and the leverage step-down, tested quarterly on certified financials.
- Report if top-3 customer concentration exceeds 45% of revenue.
- Sponsor holding not below 51%; no fresh pledge without lender consent.
- Route proportionate sales through the syndicate; maintain borrowing-base discipline.
$45.0M senior secured term loan, priced SOFR-linked ~9.25% all-in, RAROC 18.9% against a 15% hurdle, secured 1.31x with a quarterly-tested covenant package and the conditions precedent above.
Loan types
Choose a loan type

Same rigor on every loan type
AI extracts, our experts verify, and your credit team decides.
- Faster deal closure
- 75%
- Reduce time from document intake to credit committee
- Accuracy with expert review
- 100%
- AI extracts, domain experts verify every output
- Audit trail coverage
- Full
- Every decision linked to source documents
By lender
Built for how you lend
Frequently asked questions
Still deciding? Talk to our team.
What loan types does Vishwa AI support?
Vishwa AI underwrites commercial real estate (multifamily, office, retail, industrial, hospitality, self storage, and mixed use), construction and bridge loans, C&I term loans and lines of credit, SBA 7(a) and 504 loans, asset-based loans, equipment finance, agricultural loans, and private credit. The platform adapts to each loan type's documents, metrics, and credit policy.
Is AI underwriting auditable and explainable?
Yes. Every figure links to the source document and the calculation behind it, so when an examiner, an auditor, or an LP asks how you got a number, you can show them in one click. Vishwa AI applies the same logic to every deal and keeps a complete audit trail, which is usually the part manual spreading cannot reproduce six months later.
How accurate is the extraction, and is there human review?
AI extracts, our experts verify, and your analysts review the exceptions. In practice that turns a multi-day spreading exercise into a quick validation, with people focused on the cases that need judgment rather than re-keying a T-12 into Excel.

Bring a file from any loan type
Show us a live credit file. We will spread it, compute the numbers your policy uses, and draft the credit memo, with every figure traced to its source.